Post # 7 - Rebirth - Part 1
Are you visiting this Blog for the 1st time? If so I
suggest that you read the 1st Post on the Blog from the
Archives to know about the blog before reading on.
Rebirth and Kamma – how should we
understand them?
The attempt here is to highlight
some salient points on this very crucial topic. I have collected some significant
and relevant facts on this subject from
talks and writings of eminent Dhamma scholars to place before you for your
review and analysis.
The objective is for creating
sufficient interest in the topic so that the keen learner will be motivated to
access more such texts and seek more opportunities to get a better
understanding. In other words this collection is by no means exhaustive or
complete, as coverage for the topic. However it is hoped that the reader would have
sufficient facts to dispel any doubts or uncertainties he/she may have on this
important subject, which can be considered as one of the pillars underpinning
Buddhist practice.
Let me begin by asking the
question, what is your view about Kamma and Rebirth? Let us discuss this with
focus on how such views have a relevance to the practice of Dhamma by a lay
follower.
There is a perception that this
is the essence of Buddha’s teaching, and if you do not believe in a perceived Rebirth and Kamma you are
not a Buddhist. This of course could not be quite true looking at the
historical context, as the belief in kamma (to be discussed in detail in a
later post) and rebirth in the way it was taught in ancient religions, did
exist even before the Buddha.
Upon reaching enlightenment, the
first challenge that Buddha faced was to teach the Dhamma that he discovered.
He found that it was indeed the reality, and one which was profound and
difficult to explain. He realized that what people believed in and their
convictions, had to be accommodated in the teaching to encourage them to join
in, when he attempted to teach the Dhamma he
discovered. So he treated the
prevailing teachings in the religions, which included kamma and rebirth as
concepts or conventional (sammuthi) truths, while what he discovered he treated as the
reality (paramatta).
He found that thinkers at that
time were asking some serious questions about their own existence. Bhanthe Dr.Punnaji
in his book “Horizons of Time”, has articulated these questions quoting the
Sabbasawa Sutta as follows:
“did I exist in the past?; did I
not exist in the past?; what was I in the past?; how was I in the past?; having
being what, to what did I change into in the past?”;
There were also similar questions
about the future such as – “will I exist in the future?; will I not exist in
the future?; what will I be in the future? How will I be in the future?; having
being what, to what will I change into in the future?”
Similarly there were questions about the
present as well, which included among others; “from where did this existence
come?; where will this existence go?” etc.
Most religions answered these
questions on the basis of a supreme creator and his doings. People accepted
these explanations. It was sometimes through fear of the unknown or due to
uncertainty.
There are references to
resurrection- bringing life into a dead body; reincarnation- a permanent soul
entering another body; transmigration- a soul leaving one body and taking over
another body; and rebirth – a soul taking on a new life. What Buddha discovered however was contrary
to all these teachings.
The
Buddha rejected an "eternalist" view, which in the Buddhist sense
means a belief in an individual eternal soul that survives death. But he also
rejected the nihilist view that there is no existence for any of us beyond this
one.
He said in his first uttering
upon reaching enlightenment that- “Oh builder (creator), I have seen you! You
will not create me anymore! I have
destroyed all your supports! I have broken the whole structure! My mind has
stopped creating! This will be my last becoming! It’s the emotions(Thanna) that
are creating existence etc.
However the Buddha had to factor
in the common beliefs of the people at that time, into his teachings. He
therefore conducted his teaching under the premise of two Dhammas. One a
worldly Dhamma or mundane Dhamma (Sammuthi Satta), with relevance to the worldly life and more in harmony with the existing beliefs,
which are included in the ‘Sutta’ texts
in the ‘Thripitaka’ and the other as a supra mundane or world transcending-
Dhamma, related to the actuality documented in the ‘Abidhamma’ texts.
C.P. Ranasinghe in his book ‘The
Buddha’s Explanation of the Universe’ says that:-
“if we
are people who would accept whatever a Buddha or an Arahant said, there exists
much material in Buddhist scriptures depicting different instances of rebirth.
This method of accepting the doctrine of rebirth is very unsatisfactory and
Buddha himself rejected such attitudes. Accepting the doctrine of rebirth in this
manner often brings in its train various superstitions which obstructs our
understanding of the deeper truth”.
Bhikkhu Bhodhi the
scholar monk from US says in his article on – ‘Does Rebirth Make Sense?’:-
“Even modernist interpreters of Buddhism seem to have trouble
taking the rebirth teaching seriously. Some dismiss it as just a piece of
cultural baggage, ‘ancient Indian metaphysics’ that the Buddha retained in
deference to the world view of his age. Others interpret it as a metaphor for
the change of mental states, with the realms of rebirth seen as symbols for
psychological archetypes. A few critics even question the authenticity of the
texts on rebirth, arguing that they must be interpolations”.
In this essay Bhikkhu Bhodhi goes on to say that:-
“I won't be arguing
the case for the scientific validity of rebirth. Instead, I wish to show that
the idea of rebirth makes sense.
I will be contending that it ‘makes sense’ in two ways: first, in that it is intelligible, having meaning both
intrinsically and in relation to the Dhamma as a whole; and second, in that it
helps us to make sense, to
understand our own place in the world. The teaching of rebirth makes sense in relation to ethics.
When we encounter
suitable external conditions, the kammic seeds deposited in our mental
continuum rise up from their dormant condition and produce their fruits. The
most important function performed by kamma is to generate rebirth into an
appropriate realm, a realm that provides a field for it to unfold its stored potentials.
There is a tremendous variety among the living beings existing in
the world. People and animals are of different sorts. What is it that causes us
to take birth in a particular form? Does it happen through coincidence,
through accident, by chance without any reason or is there some principle
behind it? What is it that determines the form of rebirth we take? Buddha answers these questions, with the Pali term "kamma".
More elaborations and justifications by Bhikkhu Bhodhi on why
rebirth makes sense is given in the next post- Rebirth Part 2-
There are also many other
treatise on rebirth in the web. Experimental sciences have been looking at
evidences of previous lives of people through such methods as hypnotic analysis
etc.
Ven Ajahn Brahm has given many
talks with rational analysis on rebirth. In one talk he gives an illustration
for the doctrine of rebirth as taught in Buddha Dhamma, to show the difference in
the concept of a permanent soul migrating from birth to birth, by a worldly
simile. He says that when we eat a mango
and deposit the seed appropriately it germinates and produces a plant, a tree
and eventually a mango. This mango is not the same mango that we ate but
another mango. It demonstrates the features of the mango we ate, whether sweet
or sour or other, by some process of genetic inheritance. Although the original mango is no more and
did not reappear in a new form now, it did transfer its characteristics to the
new mango.
How Buddhist
Rebirth "Works"
Understanding the Buddhist doctrine of
rebirth rests upon understanding how Buddhists view the self. The Buddha
taught that the perception that we are all distinct, stand-alone people-units
is an illusion and the chief cause of our problems.
From the foregoing you will see
that I have been extracting quotes or explanations from these great scholars
and bringing them up for reference by you, which is my privilege through this
Blog. These arguments give us enough material to ponder upon to orient our
thinking towards the subject in question.
I will be attempting to gather
more such material to explore other aspects on this subject. Please await the
next post- Rebirth Part 2
Good sources trying to elucidate the concept of rebirth. I am no scholar, but I had a personal insight. I was madly in love with my wife, and we were so involved emotionally that it was as if two bodies with a common soul!
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, she died young and I
was devastated. Being a setting believer in reincarnation, I was wishing that, if I were to be born again, let she only be my wife.
Then it suddenly dawned on me to ask the question "what is the meaning of this wish?".
Her body which bore her name of this birth was gone. And it will be same for me also. So, the reincarnation as we believed didn't make much sense...